Ofccp Revises Its Pay Equity Directive – Government Contracts, Procurement &Amp; Ppp – United States – Mondaq

OFCCP Revises Its Pay Equity Directive – Government Contracts, Procurement & PPP – United States – Mondaq

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.
As we previously reported, in March of this year, OFCCP issued its first directive of the Biden Administration – Directive 2022-01 (the “Directive”) – which addressed the issue of contractors' obligations to conduct analyses of their compensation systems, as well as the agency's expectations regarding providing those analyses when under audit. The Directive received a lot of (mostly negative) attention, for appearing to indicate the agency would demand privileged pay equity analyses during audits, as well suggesting that contractors are obligated by regulation to conduct full pay equity analyses.
Now, five months after issuing the Directive, the agency has issued significant revisions to it. As summarized in its announcement, the Directive has been revised in three main ways:
It also removes references to “pay equity audits,” replacing the phrase with “compensation analysis,” in order to, as OFCCP Director Jenny Yang contends, “avoid any confusion regarding the nature of a contractor's obligations.”
OFCCP “reaffirms” (or reverses) its position on production of privileged materials. With respect to production of privileged information, the Directive now states that the “Directive is not intended to encourage waiver of privilege. Rather, this Directive informs contractors that, where they maintain this information in non-privileged form, making it available can assist OFCCP in conducting a more efficient compliance evaluation.” While the agency characterizes this as a “reaffirm[ation],” it is clearly an effort to reverse the clear impression that the agency would be demanding privileged information the original Directive generated.
Even so, the agency makes clear that contractors will not be permitted to simply claim their compensation assessments are protected from disclosure during an audit. The Directive provides that “[c]ontractors will not be found in compliance with their compensation analysis obligations if they simply invoke privilege and provide OFCCP with no or insufficient documentation of compliance.” As discussed below, OFCCP maintains contractors have methods of confirming compliance without revealing privileged information.
OFCCP details what it expects to see from contractors regarding their compensation assessments. The Directive contends that contractors are required to conduct analyses of their compensation systems and provide documentation “confirm[ing] that the contractor has evaluated its compensation systems for race-, gender-, or ethnicity-based disparities.” The agency notes that “the most useful form of documentation is a contractor's full compensation analysis because it allows OFCCP to understand how the contractor evaluates its compensation systems in practice,” and “encourage[s]” contractors to provide their “full compensation analyses available where OFCCP identifies concerns during a compliance evaluation.”
Where a contractor's full compensation analysis contains privileged communications or protected work product, the Directive provides that the contractor “may fulfill its regulatory obligations by making available to OFCCP other documentation that it has conducted the [required] compensation analysis.” The Directive identifies a number of ways this can be accomplished:
The Directive notes that where compensation evaluation documentation is demanded by the agency, the contractor must
“provide documentation that demonstrates at least the following:
i. when the compensation analysis was completed;
ii. the number of employees the compensation analysis included and the number and categories of employees the compensation analysis excluded;
iii. which forms of compensation were analyzed and, where applicable, how the different forms of compensation were separated or combined for analysis (e.g., base pay alone, base pay combined with bonuses, etc.);
iv. that compensation was analyzed by gender, race, and ethnicity; and
v. the method of analysis employed by the contractor (e.g., multiple regression analysis, decomposition regression analysis, meta-analytic tests of z-scores, compa-ratio regression analysis, rank-sums tests, career-stall analysis, average pay ratio, cohort analysis, etc.).”
Documentation of Action-Oriented Programs To Correct Pay Disparities. The Directive also addresses the information a contractor must provide during an audit regarding pay disparities discovered during a compensation analysis. Specifically, the Directive provides that where such disparities are discovered, OFCCP regulations “require the contractor to develop and execute action-oriented programs to correct them.” As such, “OFCCP may request documentation demonstrating that the contractor did so.” When it does,
“OFCCP will require documentation that demonstrates, at a minimum:
i. the nature and extent of any pay disparities found, including the categories of jobs for which disparities were found, the degree of the disparities, and the groups adversely affected;
ii. whether the contractor investigated the reasons for any pay disparities found;
iii. that the contractor has instituted action-oriented programs designed to correct any problem areas identified;
iv. the nature and scope of these programs, including the job(s) for which the programs apply and any changes (e.g., pay increases, amendments to compensation policies and procedures) the contractor made to the compensation system; and
v. how the contractor intends to measure the impact of these programs on employment opportunities and identified barriers.”
In her blog post published on August 18, 2022, Director Yang confirms that “[c]ombatting pay discrimination is a top priority for OFCCP” and notes that OFCCP “reviews contractors' pay data and practices to identify problems that would not otherwise come to light because workers are often unaware of their colleagues' pay.”
As such, contractors need to understand that notwithstanding the welcome “reaffirmations” contained in the Directive, OFCCP remains focused on pay discrimination issues and will devote significant attention to compensation matters during audits. Contractors should familiarize themselves with the Directive, as revised, and ensure they are prepared to respond to OFCCP's inquiries regarding their compensation analyses.
OFCCP Revises Its Pay Equity Directive
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
  © Mondaq® Ltd 1994 – 2022. All Rights Reserved.

Passwords are Case Sensitive

Forgot your password?
Free, unlimited access to more than half a million articles (one-article limit removed) from the diverse perspectives of 5,000 leading law, accountancy and advisory firms
Articles tailored to your interests and optional alerts about important changes
Receive priority invitations to relevant webinars and events
You’ll only need to do it once, and readership information is just for authors and is never sold to third parties.
We need this to enable us to match you with other users from the same organisation. It is also part of the information that we share to our content providers (“Contributors”) who contribute Content for free for your use.


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Nordic private equity firms pursue cyber security acquisitions – ComputerWeekly.com

Automotive rewrites the rules for cyber security – Automotive World

VA CIO DelBene Making the Cyber Gates a Little Higher, More Well-Rounded – HS Today – HSToday

Managing cyber security risks: key learnings from Australia’s first test case – JD Supra