02 December 2022
The incorporation of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices in guiding corporate decision-making in Latin America is following a growing global trend of focus on sustainability, ESG and impact investing by shareholders, customers and employees. Attorneys practising in the region should be prepared to address ESG matters in transactional preparation, due diligence investigations, acquisition documentation and post-closing operations as ESG practices are adopted by financial institutions, strategic investors and regulatory authorities throughout Latin America. However, even ahead of regulation, in most cases ESG is considered both a driver of value in M&A and a means of reducing risks associated with operations post-acquisition.
ESG criteria are standards that seek to integrate ESG data related to company performance into the decision-making and risk management process for investors, financial institutions and regulators, among others. Environmental criteria are used to consider how a company performs to reduce its impact on the natural environment (e.g., climate, energy emissions, water). Social criteria examine how companies manage their relationships with all stakeholders (e.g., employees, suppliers, customers and the communities where they operate) rather than just shareholders. Governance risks concern how a company is run and are often tied to areas such as company leadership, anti-corruption, executive pay, auditing, internal controls, transparency in disclosure, corporate governance and shareholder rights.
ESG investing can potentially increase value and mitigate governance and social risks, such as loss of assets due to lawsuits, social discord, political intervention, environmental harm or regulatory fines and penalties. The market seems to agree, with ESG funds receiving, in 2021, US$500 billion of net new capital from investors in ESG-integrated funds in 2021. ESG and climate-focused investing is one of the fastest growing areas of US investment focus, with ESG asset funds holding US$22 trillion in assets in 2022, representing 40 per cent growth over the past two years. Companies have raised approximately US$320 billion in green bonds and loans this year, and another US$400 billion in debt with sustainability targets. Start-ups focused on clean and renewable energy sources have raised US$27 billion in equity as of August 2022. Such growth is linked to an accelerating push from governments globally to encourage climate-friendly investments, many of which are held by ESG funds, by transitioning to low-carbon energy economies and updating their market rules and tax regimes. In Latin America and the Caribbean, FDI investment grew by 56 per cent in 2021 – a growth that has rebounded from a 45 per cent drop in 2020, mainly due to the global pandemic – in large part due to a paradigm shift by multinational companies operating in the region to push a sustainable development agenda. BlackRock, State Street, T. Rowe Price, Vanguard and other large fund managers have stated that ESG-focused companies create long-term value for stockholders. Some credit rating agencies have begun assessing ESG risk with the same rigour as traditional metrics like credit and liquidity risk. Meanwhile, law firms worldwide have started tailoring their services to provide clients with a comprehensive examination of their targets from an ESG perspective.
Tracking and analysing ESG information remains a work in progress, as no uniform reporting standard has been universally adopted. To further complicate matters, ESG considerations differ depending on the sector and region in which a company operates. Although there is currently no one globally accepted ESG measurement standard, currently the leading ESG standard organisations are:
These leading organisations are aware of the need to set one standardised measuring system for ESG and, in 2020, published a prototype climate-related financial disclosure standard and a joint statement of intention to work with each other and other key institutions, including the International Organization of Securities, the International Financial Reporting Standards, the European Commission and the World Economic Forum’s International Business Council, to develop global standards.
ESG framework providers attempt to provide guidance as to which factors and indicators should be prioritised in different sectors. The SASB, for example, has worked to implement a uniform ESG reporting standard to aid investors in identifying the minimum set of sustainability issues likely to be material for companies within a given industry. The SASB’s ‘Materiality Map’ highlights the types of risks prevalent across a multitude of sectors. The risk types span five major categories:
For example, the map identifies the following high-risk areas for a company that operates in the metals and mining sector: GHG emissions, air quality, energy management, waste and water management, waste and hazardous materials management, ecological impacts, labour practices, employee health and safety and business ethics. A team working on an M&A deal can use this tool to identify the baseline risks in the target company’s sector. Nonetheless, although ESG framework and standard setting institutions provide guidance as to the factors to analyse in each industry, and the SABS tries to focus on those sustainability factors that are likely to have material financial impact, there is still difficulty quantifying the financial impact or materiality of ESG data as ESG frameworks relate mostly to non-financial disclosures.
ESG standards may be broken down further into three separate classes:
Compliance is an area where legal departments are heavily involved, and covers risks such as human rights, trafficking, slavery, conflict minerals, anticorruption compliance, privacy and cybersecurity. ESG standards that are ‘material to operations’ flag and track those ESG standards imposed by regulations (e.g., SEC guidelines and SASB compliance), which carry reporting requirements and potential penalties for non-compliance. Finally, certain companies incorporate ESG policies that surpass those that are required by law or by regulatory authorities, such as having a corporate social responsibility policy and other philanthropic initiatives (e.g., carbon reduction, responsible sourcing, responsible artificial AI development and inclusive economic opportunity commitments) that the company may, but is not legally required to, have.
Although Latin America lags behind other regions in adopting ESG practices, Latin American companies are increasingly working to improve ESG standards following criteria established by growing international investor focus on ESG, and credit rating agencies that focus on ESG when evaluating a company’s creditworthiness. The shift of Latin American companies towards a more ESG-driven approach is reflected in the IndexAmericas created by the Inter-American Development Bank, which highlights the top 100 sustainable firms operating in Latin America and the Caribbean, measured against ESG criteria. The IndexAmericas, which initially comprised mostly multinationals operating in the region, has seen an increase in recent years in the number of Latin American companies on the index of more than 30 per cent.
In Latin America, the financial industry and government regulators are driving ESG efforts, as evidenced by economic trends. Latin American governments are increasingly using ESG as an instrument to address social and environmental matters and the consequences of the covid-19 pandemic. Countries in the region are promoting ESG policies to drive investment and address social unrest prevalent in the region. There is enhanced clarity that Latin America would benefit from low carbon energy solutions to address the growing threat of climate disasters, as well as stricter criminal laws, enforcement mechanisms and tools to address social inequality (such as exploitation, gender violence and poverty), environmental degradation and political corruption in the region. Commitments from local officials and governments to implement ESG policies attract investors focused on ESG to the region. Notable advancements by Latin American regulators in the ESG arena include the following.
Approximately 73 per cent of the Mexican SDG issuance went to ‘sustainable investors’, which incorporate ESG criteria into their investment decision-making process. Mexico has earmarked the proceeds from the bond issuance to finance ESG-related projects across 1,345 cities grappling with low literacy and school attendance rates, poor health services, lack of toilets, sewage and potable drinking water in homes and lack of access to electricity.
Mexico’s pension fund regulator (CONSAR) has published rules regarding investment strategies that include an obligation to analyse companies’ social responsibility credentials, effective January 2022. As a result of this rule, retirement funds will be required to incorporate sustainability criteria in their methodologies and prioritise ESG investments in their portfolios, as well as advocate within the public companies in which they are represented for compliance with sustainable principles. In addition, companies who list their securities with the Registro Nacionel de Valores must disclose in their annual reports the existence of any environmental policies, any projects impacting the environment and natural resources and any impacts of climate on the business of the listed company. In addition, the Internal Regulations of the Mexican stock exchange (BMV) require publicly traded companies to adhere to the Code of Professional Ethics and certify such compliance in the annual report of the listed company.
Mexico was home to Latin America’s second ESG index. Additionally, the BMV has created Exchange Traded Funds that replicate the performance of their ESG indices and as many as 21 sustainable (green, social and sustainable) bonds. Lastly, in connection with the Climate Bonds Initiative, the BMV founded the Green Finance Advisory Council with the aim of promoting sustainable finance and public policy changes driven by ESG.
A resolution passed by the Brazilian National Monetary Council in 2018 requires pension fund asset managers to consider ESG risks as part of their investment decision-making process. This development is a significant advancement from prior resolutions, as it increases the obligation from mere disclosure of ESG considerations to a mandate to integrate ESG issues whenever possible. On 30 April 2021, the Brazilian Central Bank implemented regulatory initiatives to increase banks’ ESG disclosures. In 2021 the S&P Dow Jones Indices (S&P DJI) and the Brazilian stock exchange (Brasil Bolsa Balcão [B3]) developed the S&P/B3 Brazil ESG Index to highlight strong ESG companies traded on the Brazilian stock exchange.
On 23 December 2021, the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) issued Resolution CVM 59, which provides changes to the reference form, including new disclosure obligations by publicly held companies in categories A and B, especially regarding information relating to ESG matters. Resolution CVM 59 will enter into effect on 2 January 2023 and applies to information regarding 2022.
In 2022, the CMN and the Brazilian Central Bank (BCB) issued a number of resolutions aiming to improve the rules for the management of social, environmental and climate risk applicable to financial institutions and other institutions authorised to operate by the BCB. These resolutions also include the requirements for institutions in the establishment of their Social, Environmental and Climate Responsibility Policies and in the implementation of actions designed to ensure effectiveness.
The Brazilian President has approved Decree No. 11,129/2022, which changes the methods public authorities use to evaluate companies’ compliance programmes. The Bill of Law No. 572/2022, which is still under discussion in the Brazilian Congress, aims to establish compliance parameters for companies to observe and enforce human rights within their organisations. Both regulations bring Brazilian legislation closer to international ESG practices.
In November 2021, the Chilean Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) published General Rule No. 461 (NCG), which modifies the structure and content of ESG matters to be included in annual reports for entities issuing securities registered with the CMF Securities Registry. Under the new regulation, the NCG eliminates the former Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development section from the annual reports, replacing it with the obligation to report on ESG factors in all sections of the annual report, increasing the minimum informational disclosure requirements for issuers.
Every registered entity should describe how it integrates a sustainability and environmental approach in its business and mention its strategy to minimise the negative environmental aspects of the core business.
Registered entities should also provide information on ESG policies risk management undertaken by their boards of directors in monitoring and adhering to ESG models and programmes. Additionally, the entities should disclose the frequency that environmental and social matters are reported, especially with respect to climate change, and whether these matters are included when discussing and adopting strategic decisions, business plans or budgets.
Finally, the entities should disclose their ESG models and programmes containing information on the definition of their ESG obligations, compliance modality, implementation deadlines, reporting unit and environmental risk matrix; any relevant background must be reported. If ESG models or programmes are not available for a registered entity, this must be clearly disclosed in annual reports, indicating the reasons they are not available. In addition, the entity should disclose to the public the number of enforced sanctions registered in the Public Registry of Sanctions of the Environment Commission of Chile or its equivalent in foreign jurisdictions, along with:
Registered issuers can voluntarily comply with regulations for the 2022 tax year (for the report to be delivered in 2023); however, the regulations will be mandatory:
In March 2022, Chile became the first country in Latin America to issue a sovereign sustainability-linked bond. This US$2 billion bond adheres to the Paris climate accords, and includes commitments to reduce carbon dioxide emission, and increase renewable energy production to 60 per cent of electricity needs by 2032. With this new issuance, Chile has placed over US$33 billion in socially and environmentally responsible bonds in the past three years, being the only country in the world to have green, social and sustainability-linked bonds. On 13 June 2022, Chile published its Climate Change Framework Law, which includes a binding target of net zero emissions by 2050. It creates cross-agency and departmental coordination and cooperation beyond the Ministry of the Environment to make carbon emissions compliance, targeting and goals a matter of national importance, and not solely within the purview of solely environmental agencies.
The Colombian National Council on Economic and Social Policy (CONPES) enacted laws and policies such as the Green Growth Policy (CONPES 3934) and the Strategy for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Objectives in Colombia (CONPES 3918), which exemplify a commitment to exploring new sources of sustainable economic growth. These policies incorporate ESG into Colombia’s strategic initiatives to maintain sustained development. The CONPES policies prioritise the diversification of Colombia’s economy based on commitments to sustainable use of the country’s natural resources, strengthening the nation’s human capital, and transparent incorporation of ESG metrics in evaluating future projects and investments.
Colombia has also made concrete strides to solidify ESG initiatives in its financial infrastructure. In April 2021, Colombia’s Financial Superintendency adopted Circular 007, which requires that all Colombian institutional investors, as part of their mandated disclosures, discuss the ways in which ESG factors were evaluated when making investment decisions. Colombia has enacted other laws, through different ministries and departments, which increase the disclosure requirements by domestic companies of their adoption and compliance with ESG policies. Lastly, Colombia’s Financial Superintendency has also promulgated laws such as Circular 028, which outlines the best practices for the issuance of green bonds by Colombian issuers. The Financial Superintendence of Colombia recently established goals for developing sustainable finance in Colombia, focusing on green taxonomy; financial innovation; data metrics and innovation; ESG and methods for measuring climate and nature risks.
Large international investors, companies and regulators stressing the importance of ESG are driving exponential growth in ESG diligence and disclosures during the lifecycle of M&A transactions. As investors incorporate ESG performance metrics into a target’s valuation and risk assessment, ESG key performance metrics are being gathered and measured during the diligence process and throughout the negotiation of acquisition contracts. ESG is being woven into M&A in the following areas: the diligence process, negotiation of contractual protections and post-closing integration of the target business into the overall ESG regime of the acquiror.
ESG is not a one-size-fits-all proposition for every company operating in every industry and every jurisdiction. While there are measurements used across industries that are of particular importance for most companies (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and antibribery; privacy and cybersecurity; climate (risk and emission); diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI); and human rights and labour practices), other ESG indicators measured by investors vary based on a company’s industry or region. Sell-side advisers should guide a target company to focus on ESG by identifying:
While some ESG diligence may relate to topics traditionally covered in the ordinary due diligence process, ESG due diligence typically goes further, focusing on the target’s values, culture and social responsibility. For instance, traditional due diligence typically addresses the target’s compliance with labour and employment laws; however, ESG due diligence may address workplace diversity, gender inequity, sexual harassment and workplace misconduct.
ESG due diligence is still evolving and there is no defined process to properly measure ESG risks associated with a target; however, sell-side advisers should prepare their clients in advance to be evaluated and rated by potential acquirers in accordance with at least one of the commonly used ESG measurement standards previously discussed.
In connection with the ESG diligence process, target companies should be prepared to provide key ESG data tailored for their particular industry based on the measurement standards by one of the above-listed ESG standard organisations, including, among other things, relevant information regarding the following:
As further discussed below, sell-side advisers can also assist target companies in establishing and implementing corporate governance initiatives where practicable in advance of a diligence process, including policies regarding political contributions and government relations; appointment of independent directors and audit committees; conflicts of interests; related party transaction reporting and approval; anti-corruption policies and procedures; whistle-blower protection; and the establishment of a code of ethics and code of conduct. Target companies preparing for the M&A process should also develop their own system of record-keeping and evaluation of its compliance with any mandated reporting regime and compliance with the self-imposed policies described above.
Representations and warranties regarding compliance with anti-money laundering laws, data privacy laws, anti-corruption laws and trade laws are customary in M&A transactions in the region, together with representations regarding compliance regimes, monitoring and compliance testing. However, Latin America may slowly start to see more specific ESG-focused provisions such as the ‘Weinstein clauses’ (where a target represents and warrants that its officers or executives have been the subject of allegations of sexual harassment or misconduct). Additionally, other ESG-focused representations will include those regarding the target’s compliance with applicable ESG policies (assuming the target has committed to comply with such standards) or representations particular to the target’s industry and region regarding social, labour, health and safety, security or environmental incidents.
Notwithstanding, the ESG focus in M&A contracts is likely to also focus largely on ESG post-closing covenants regarding the implementation of and adherence to ESG policies and procedures, especially in the event of a partial or staggered sale or a contingent value right pricing element, such as earn-outs. To ensure a robust data gathering and reporting process in an M&A deal, the transaction should include, as a preliminary matter, a covenant to implement any of the more widely accepted ESG reporting standards (e.g., SASB, CDSB or IIRC) if the target has not already done so. The covenant can be robust and include establishing key performance indicators upon which to measure ESG performance and setting a timeline for implementing the ESG reporting standards along with the frequency that such data is reported and measured. Other covenants can address ESG risks pertinent to the target. For instance, acquirers might use a covenant to implement cybersecurity and data privacy initiatives, sustainably source raw materials, commit to reducing carbon emissions by a specific date, diversify the workforce, and more. The key is to ensure that the covenant emphasises the reporting and data collection efforts required to achieve these ESG goals.
Given the evidence that positive ESG results can drive long-term shareholder value, experts believe that executive incentive plans designs would be better served by including ‘quantifiable’ ESG measures. As such, M&A transactions may also include covenants in executive compensation packages that provide incentives to drive ESG goals. However, covenant drafters should pay special attention to addressing the reliability of the ESG metrics used to quantify such outcomes. A way to avoid questionable reporting practices by executives is to peg non-executive employee compensation and promotions to ESG reporting goals (as opposed to ESG outcome). According to experts, when companies decide to incorporate ESG measures into annual incentive plans for executives, they can measure progress between three to five years, or toward longer-term objectives when ESG goals cannot be measured over a 12-month period, such as climate-related issues that warrant a much lengthier view (10 years and longer). Such covenants must be structured in a way that will provide flexibility for uncertainties such as evolving market trends and ESG standards, and be limited to a focus on up to three ESG measures to guarantee focus, efficacy and compliance.
Buyers can also use pre-closing covenants and closing conditions to address ESG issues identified during the due diligence phase of the M&A transaction. For example, buyers can cause the target company to adopt any of the internationally-recognised ESG reporting frameworks and provide a deliverable by the closing date that shows it adopted such framework while disclosing all actual and anticipated ESG risks. In addition, buyers can request a special indemnification agreement to address all known ESG issues and risks, to be reassured and to mitigate risk pre-closing. The use of such pre-closing covenants and closing conditions is particularly useful in transactions with longer wait times between signing and closing, such as those requiring regulatory approvals (e.g., CNBV approvals in Mexico or CADE approvals in Brazil). In deals with shorter pre-closing periods, the target company can covenant to implement an ESG compliance programme within a specified period post-closing. Notwithstanding the pre-closing period’s length, incorporating pre-closing covenants and closing conditions in the M&A agreement will ensure a smooth transition during the post-closing integration of the contemplated ESG programmes.
After completion of diligence and the closing of an acquisition, acquirers will likely implement programmes to address and monitor any ESG risks or shortfalls discovered during the diligence process (in addition to integration, compliance and monitoring of any ESG programmes already in place pre-acquisition).
Acquirers will generally want to align a target’s overall ESG philosophy and culture to its own by monitoring implementation and compliance of any ESG policies. ESG compliance is bespoke to each company while being guided largely by the global ESG measurement standards issued by the institutions discussed above. However, there are certain strategies and initiatives to consider when completing a successful post-closing implementation of ESG metrics into a target operation:
Additionally, while the above examples lend some insight into ESG post-closing integration, attorneys in Latin America should tailor their ESG approach to meet more specific regional needs and the regulatory environment in each jurisdiction. Ideally, where possible, ESG initiatives identified above can be part of a pre-transaction planning to emphasise a commitment to ESG prior to a sale process to uncover and remediate any systemic risks in advance of a change of control transaction or outside investment.
As ESG continues to evolve in Latin America, attorneys should expect to play a larger role in the analysis of more detailed, ESG-driven information and the exploration of uniquely Latin American environmental, social and governance issues. With these regimes continuing to grow and develop, ESG matters will increase in importance in transaction planning, negotiation and post-closing integration. Accordingly, attorneys in the region must work to familiarise themselves with the types of issues capable of halting a deal in its tracks and remain abreast of decisions by local regulators, relevant government priorities and global trends that may be adopted in the region.
 Randy Bullard is a partner and Giselle C Sardiñas is an associate at Morrison & Foerster. Diego Rodriguez and Karina Vlahos are visiting international attorneys at Morrison & Foerster.
 Morningstar, USD as of 31 December 2021. Includes all open-end funds and ETFs domiciled In Europe, excluding money market funds. Jennifer Wu, ‘ESG outlook 2022: The future of ESG Investing’ 2 January 2022, https://am.jpmorgan.com/dk/en/asset-management/liq/investment-themes/sustainable-investing/future-of-esg-investing/.
 Amrith Ramkumar ‘Some GOP States Push Back Against EQG Investing Trend’, 30 August 2022, The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/esg-backlash-at-odds-with-shift-by-companies-and-investors-11661825320.
 UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2022 ‘Foreign Direct Investment to Latin America Rebounded by 56% In 2021’, https://unctad.org/news/foreign-direct-Investment-latin-america-rebounded-56-2021#.
 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Increased by 13.2% in 2018, Ending a Five-Year Downward Trend’, 5 August 2019, https://www.cepal.org/en/pressreleases/foreign-direct-investment-latin-america-and-caribbean-increased-132-2018-ending-five.
 Impact Management Project, World Economic Forum and Deloitte, ‘Statement of Intent to Work Together Towards Comprehensive Corporate Reporting’, September 2020, https://29kjwb3armds2g3gi4lq2sx1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/
 S&P Global Ratings, ‘How ESG Factors Can Affect Credit Ratings’, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/products-benefits/products/esg-in-credit-ratings#overview.
 Inter-American Development Bank, ‘The Four Dimensions of Sustainability Captured by IndexAmericas: ESGD’, https://indexamericas.iadb.org/en/Aboutus.
 See Chapter 1 of this guide, ‘Roundtable: The Impact of Political Instability and Social Unrest on Dealmaking in Latin America’.
 United Nations Development Programme, ‘Historic $890 million Sustainable Development Goals Bond issued by Mexico’, 14 September 2020, https://www.undp.org/press-releases/historic-890-million-sustainable-development-goals-bond-issued-mexico.
 Environmental, Social & Governance Law Mexico 2022, Global Legal Group.
 Nasdaq, ‘Leading in an Era of Impact: Inside Bolsa Mexicana de Valores’ Decade-long Journey to Build Sustainable Finance in Mexico’, 30 July 2021, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/leading-in-an-era-of-impact%3A-inside-bolsa-mexicana-de-valores-decade-long-journey-to-build.
 United Nations Environment Program Finance Initiative,’ Brazilian Monetary Authority Approves New ESG Requirements in the Investment Rules of Occupational Pension Funds’, 10 July 2018, https://www.unepfi.org/news/industries/investment/brazilian-monetary-authority-approves-new-esg-requirements/.
 Central Bank of Brazil, ‘BCB Public Consultation No. 86/2021 – Regulation on the disclosure of social, environmental, and climate-related risks by financial institutions’, 30 April 2021.
 S&P Dow Jones Indices, ‘S&P/B3 Brazil ESG Index’, https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/esg/sp-b3-brazil-esg-index/#overview.
 Resolution CMN No. 4,943/2021, Resolution CMN No. 4,945/2021 and Resolution BCB No. 151/2021, which became effective on 1 July 2022, and Resolution CMN No. 4.944/2021 and Resolution BCB No. 139/2021, which will become effective on 1 December 2022.
 Ryan Jeffrey Sy, ‘World’s 1st Sovereign Sustainability Linked Bond issued by Chile’, S&P Global Intelligence, 4 March 2022, https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/world-s-1st-sovereign-sustainability-linked-bond-issued-by-chile-69226229.
 Robert Currie Ross, ‘Chile Adopts New Climate Change Framework Law: A Paradigm Shift’, 22 June 2022, Climate Law Blog, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Columbia Law School, https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2022/06/22/chile-adopts-new-climate-change-framework-law-a-paradigm-shift.
 CONPES, ‘Estrategia para la Implementación de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) en Colombia’, 15 March 2018, https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3918.pdf.
 Brigard Urrutia, ‘CONPES for sustainable economic recovery’, 26 February 2021, https://bu.com.co/en/noticias/conpes-sustainable-economic-recovery.
 Vlex, ‘Circular externa 007 de Superintendencia Financiera, de 26 de Abril de 2021’, 26 April 2021, https://vlex.com.co/vid/866596373.
 Jose V. Zapata, Daniel Fajardo Villada and Camila Del Villar, ‘Superfinanciera expide reglamento sobre emisión de Bonos Verdes en Colombia’, Holland & Knight, 10 September 2020, https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2020/09/superfinanciera-expide-reglamento-sobre-emision-de-bonos-verdes.
 Vlex, ‘Circular externa 007 de Superintendencia Financiera, de 26 de Abril de 2021’, 26 April 2021, https://vlex.com.co/vid/866596373.
 R. Boffo and R. Patalano, ‘ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges’, OECD Paris, 2020, https://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-Challenges.pdf.
 Kristen Sullivan and Maureen Bujno, Deloitte LLP, ‘Incorporating ESG Measures Into Executive Compensation Plans’, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 24 May 2021, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/05/24/incorporating-esg-measures-into-executive-compensation-plans/.
 John A. Terry, et al., ‘Canada: The Growing Importance of ESG in M&A Transactions’, Mondaq, January 2021, https://www.mondaq.com/canada/corporate-and-company-law/1025746/the-growing-importance-of-esg-in-ma-transactions.
Author | Partner
Author | Associate
Author | International Attorney
Author | International Attorney
Paola Lozano and Daniel Hernández
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Paola Lozano, Jaime Robledo, Pablo Guerrero Valenzuela, Iván Delgado González, Ignacio Pesqueira Taunton, Estanislao Olmos, Luciana Cossermelli Tornovsky and Jean Paul Chabaneix
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Brigard Urrutia, Barros & Errázuriz Abogados, Pérez-Llorca, Galicia Abogados, Bruchou, Fernández Madero & Lombardi, Demarest Advogados and Rodrigo, Elias & Medrano Abogados
Federico Grebe, Rafael Boisset, Claudia Barrero and Martín Cruzat
Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría
Maurizio Levi-Minzi, Peter A Furci, Andrew M Levine and Jonathan Adler
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Jared Roscoe and Stephen Pelliccia
SoftBank Group International and OpenStore
Sergio Michelsen, Darío Laguado and Ángela García
Lina Uribe García and Juan Pablo Caicedo De Castro
Gómez Pinzón Abogados
Francisco Antunes Maciel Müssnich, Monique Mavignier and Ana Paula Reis
BMA Barbosa Müssnich Aragão
Fulvio Italiani and Giancarlo Carrazza
Randy Bullard, Giselle C Sardiñas, Diego Rodriguez and Karina Vlahos
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Carolina Posada, Jaime Cubillos and Estefanía Ponce
Posse Herrera Ruiz
Paola Lozano, Ralph E Pérez and Daniel Hernández
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Denise Grant, Augusto Ruiloba and Pedro de Elizalde
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Pablo Mijares and Patricio Trad
Mijares Angoitia Cortés y Fuentes
Diego Pérez Ordóñez and Andrés Brown Pérez
Pérez Bustamante & Ponce
Luis Burgueño, Alberto Cordoba and Elías Jalife
Von Wobeser y Sierra
Get more from LL
Sign up to our daily email alert
Unlock unlimited access to all Latin Lawyer content